YappariCorporate and invoice fraud
Examine relationships between employees, suppliers and companies. Place invoices and payments in context to review coincidences and possible conflicts of interest.
FraudFollow the relationships.
Follow the relationships.
Understand the potential fraud.
Connect people, companies, payments and communications to examine irregularities. Build an explanation of the case grounded in facts and sources.
Use case
Questions that guide the analysis
01 /Which people, accounts or suppliers connect several events?
02 /How do communications relate to payments?
03 /Which documents help verify a possible irregularity?
Fraud
Applications in this area
Impersonation and payment diversion
Connect messages, account changes and transfers. Reconstruct the path of a payment request and the identities involved.
Review of related cases
Organize claims, transactions or case files that share elements. Explore the available relationships while preserving each event’s sources and context.
Relevant informationPayments, people and documents.
Payments, people and documents.
One investigation.
Fraud analysis combines financial movements with business relationships and the sequence of communications.
- People, employees, intermediaries and suppliers
- Accounts, invoices, amounts and transactions
- Emails, documents and case references
- Dates and relationships requiring verification
Tools that add context
Complementary views.
Use the chart to follow entities and transactions. The timeline helps compare requests, approvals and payments against the available documentation.
Relationships and transactionsFinancial flowsTimelinesCase documentation
Explore the tool ↗A coincidence is a starting point for reviewing the case. Analysis must be checked against sources and context before assigning responsibility or reaching conclusions.
Other use cases
Yappari
Contact usLet’s discuss your area of work.
If you have a question about Yappari or its application to your professional context, you can write to us.
